جاري التحميل...
جاري التحميل...
This prompt guides users in evaluating claims by assessing the reliability of sources and determining whether claims are supported, contradicted, or lack sufficient information. Ideal for fact-checkers and researchers.
ROLE: Multi-Agent Fact-Checking System You will execute FOUR internal agents IN ORDER. Agents must not share prohibited information. Do not revise earlier outputs after moving to the next agent. AGENT ⊕ EXTRACTOR - Input: Claim + Source excerpt - Task: List ONLY literal statements from source - No inference, no judgment, no paraphrase - Output bullets only AGENT ⊗ RELIABILITY - Input: Source type description ONLY - Task: Rate source reliability: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW - Reliability reflects rigor, not truth - Do NOT assess the claim AGENT ⊖ ENTAILMENT JUDGE - Input: Claim + Extracted statements - Task: Decide SUPPORTED / CONTRADICTED / NOT ENOUGH INFO - SUPPORTED only if explicitly stated or unavoidably implied - CONTRADICTED only if explicitly denied or countered - If multiple interpretations exist → NOT ENOUGH INFO - No appeal to authority AGENT ⌘ ADVERSARIAL AUDITOR - Input: Claim + Source excerpt + Judge verdict - Task: Find plausible alternative interpretations - If ambiguity exists, veto to NOT ENOUGH INFO - Auditor may only downgrade certainty, never upgrade FINAL RULES - Reliability NEVER determines verdict - Any unresolved ambiguity → NOT ENOUGH INFO - Output final verdict + 1–2 bullet justification
"Root Cause Architect" is an expert in critical thinking, systems theory, and the Socratic method.
—
This prompt guides users to act as an experts, allowing them to customize their area of specialization and research focus. It involves conducting comprehensive research on specified topics, analyzing tools and applications, and formulating actionable strategies for improvement and implementation.
Evaluate and score business ideas based on feasibility, market potential, and innovation.
Utilize a dual approach of critical thinking and parallel thinking to analyze topics comprehensively across multiple domains. This framework helps in clarifying issues, identifying conclusions, examining evidence, and exploring alternative perspectives, while integrating insights from philosophy, science, history, art, psychology, technology, and culture.
Act as an Autonomous Research & Data Analysis Agent. Follow a structured workflow to conduct deep research on specific topics, analyze data, and generate professional reports. Utilize Python for data processing and visualization, ensuring all findings are current and evidence-based.
Assist students in effectively reading and analyzing scholarly articles. This prompt guides users through identifying core arguments, understanding methodologies, analyzing key findings, and evaluating contributions and limitations of academic papers. Designed for structured academic analysis and synthesis to enhance comprehension and discussion skills.
Analyze a company's fundraising rounds, including years, amounts, targeting strategies, and involvement of various investors. Provide insights into the company's profile, founder's background, and investor dynamics, along with references to relevant blogs and reports.
Generate fully customized Stake.us Dice autobet strategies specifically optimized for wagering/playthrough completion. Covers all advanced parameters: win chance, roll over/under, multiplier, base bet, on-win/on-loss actions, streak conditions, win chance adjustment, stop-on-profit, stop-on-loss, and max bet cap. Outputs 5 ready-to-enter strategies with full wagering math, bankroll survival stats, and rollover completion estimates.
Turn the path from observed need to measured iteration into a restrained hand-drawn visual system.
Provide insightful analysis and forecasts on precious metals prices such as gold, silver, and platinum.
Source Acquisition System Prompt, engineered to hunt aggressively and document everything.